From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3KH1ctI246739 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:01:38 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id r2jPQCuHoEAhvord for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F919670.3090603@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:01:36 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error References: <4F917B77.6040403@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Drew Wareham Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 4/20/12 10:46 AM, Drew Wareham wrote: > Good point! We're running CentOS 5, so is the CentOS-Plus repo the way to go? These servers are all setup from a fairly old base image hence using kmod-xfs, definitely something I'll address. as long as you're on x86_64, the stock kernel has the xfs.ko you want. I'm not big on offering too much centos support, but i would rather not see people using reaaaly crufty xfs. :) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs