From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3OFuKKB084175 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:56:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4F96CD24.2070805@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:56:20 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/37 V2] xfs: move busy extent handling to it's own file References: <1335160747-17254-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1335160747-17254-30-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120423175725.GG16881@sgi.com> <20120424002502.GS9541@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20120424002502.GS9541@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Ben Myers , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 04/23/12 19:25, Dave Chinner wrote: From: Dave Chinner To make it easier to handle userspace code merges, move all the busy extent handling out of the allocation code and into it's own file. The userspace code does not need the busy extent code, so this simplifies the merging of the kernel code into the userspace xfsprogs library. Because the busy extent code has been almost completely rewritten over the past couple of years, also update the copyright on this new file to include the authors that made all those changes. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- Should xfs_alloc_busy_trim() be STATIC? It is defined in xfs_extent_busy.c and used in xfs_alloc.c. Same story for the next patch which renames this routine. Thanks, Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs