From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3OIBLmO094944 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:11:26 -0500 Message-ID: <4F96ECC6.7070605@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:11:18 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/37] xfs: clean up busy extent naming References: <1335160747-17254-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1335160747-17254-31-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1335160747-17254-31-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 04/23/12 00:59, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Now that the busy extent tracking has been moved out of the > allocation files, clean up the namespace it uses to > "xfs_extent_busy" rather than a mix of "xfs_busy" and > "xfs_alloc_busy". > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- Other than the STATIC on xfs_extend_busy_trim() leaving an undefined routine in the xfs.ko, it looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs