From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	q4AIaHhl047020 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:17 -0500
Message-ID: <4FAC0A9E.3020909@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:14 -0500
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree
References: <20120510130134.0efffc5ba1f3a80c614e8f29@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20120510183245.GL3963@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120510183245.GL3963@sgi.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On 05/10/12 13:32, Ben Myers wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers<bpm@sgi.com>
>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(xfs
>   STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(xfs_alloc_arg_t *);
>   STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(xfs_alloc_arg_t *,
>   		xfs_btree_cur_t *, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *, int *);
> -STATIC void xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *,
> -		xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *);
>
>   /*
>    * Lookup the record equal to [bno, len] in the btree given by cur.
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ restart:
>    * args->minlen no suitable extent could be found, and the higher level
>    * code needs to force out the log and retry the allocation.
>    */
> -STATIC void
> +void
>   xfs_extent_busy_trim(
>   	struct xfs_alloc_arg	*args,
>   	xfs_agblock_t		bno,
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void
>   xfs_extent_busy_reuse(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno,
>   	xfs_agblock_t fbno, xfs_extlen_t flen, bool userdata);
>
> +void
> +xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, xfs_agblock_t bno,
> +	xfs_extlen_t len, xfs_agblock_t *rbno, xfs_extlen_t *rlen);
> +
>   int
>   xfs_extent_busy_ag_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b);
>
>

Hmmm, I saw that before. I have been hand patching that to test.

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs