public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: reject completely bogus remount options
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:41:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCE36C0.6070408@redhat.com> (raw)

There's a long comment about handling non-remountable
options in xfs_fs_remount, but nothing addresses the case
of completely bogus mount options at remount time, which
can lead to some severe strangeness:

# for I in `seq 1 10`; do mount -o remount,noacl /mnt/test2; done
# for I in `seq 1 10`; do mount -o remount,badoption /mnt/test2; done
# grep sdb4 /etc/mtab
/dev/sdb4 /mnt/test2 xfs rw,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption 0 0

This is a bit of a hack, but we can re-use xfs_parseargs()
with a dummy mount struct to just vet all of the remount
options which were passed in.  With this, we get a saner
result:

[44898.102990] EXT4-fs (sdb4): Unrecognized mount option "badoption" or missing value

if we try to remount with something ridiculous.

In the long run we should probably revamp a lot of the mount option
handling...

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
index 9a72dda..0402f9c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
@@ -1157,11 +1157,22 @@ xfs_fs_remount(
 	int			*flags,
 	char			*options)
 {
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = XFS_M(sb);
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = XFS_M(sb), dummy_mp;
 	substring_t		args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
 	char			*p;
 	int			error;
 
+	/*
+	 * Check all the mount options presented to be sure
+	 * there's nothing too crazy in there.  Non-remountable
+	 * but valid options are a different issue.
+	 */
+	memset(&dummy_mp, 0, sizeof(struct xfs_mount));
+	dummy_mp.m_super = sb;
+	error = xfs_parseargs(&dummy_mp, options);
+	if (error)
+		return -error;
+
 	while ((p = strsep(&options, ",")) != NULL) {
 		int token;
 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

                 reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCE36C0.6070408@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbellur@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox