From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q58JXxH1249041 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:34:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.internet-sicherheit.de (smtp.internet-sicherheit.de [194.94.127.56]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1FNQWNqVCDr8dDon (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.44.5] (unknown [10.0.44.5]) by smtp.internet-sicherheit.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB97EE0032 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 21:33:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FD253A5.3080800@internet-sicherheit.de> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:33:57 +0200 From: "Christian J. Dietrich" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Repeated XFS corruption on RAID-10 on Adaptec 51245 References: <4FD1C9B8.70907@internet-sicherheit.de> <4FD20483.2080105@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4FD20483.2080105@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric, thanks for your suggestions. Am 08.06.2012 15:56, schrieb Eric Sandeen: >> Naive, I would assume that running xfs_repair once would fix all errors. >> My guess is that the underlying RAID volume (Adaptec 51245 RAID 10) is >> somehow invalid (although I can not find any indicators confirming >> this). Any suggestions? > = > If you suspect a problem with repair, you can try: > = > # umount /dev/sda > # xfs_metadump -o /dev/sda - | xfs_mdrestore - filesystem.img > # xfs_repair filesystem.img > # xfs_repair filesystem.img > = > The image shouldn't take too much space, but 12T might take a little while > to dump. > If repair doesn't fix everything the first time please let us know. Thanks, I can confirm that xfs_repair fixes everything on the first run. > please make sure that you aren't running the old kmod-xfs (or was it > xfs-kmod?) rpm. No, I am using the default driver that comes with the distribution. Thanks again, I consider the problem to be related to the combination of controller and HDDs (and no longer to xfs) and will dig deeper into that direction. Chris -- = Christian J. Dietrich Institute for Internet Security - if(is) Westf=E4lische Hochschule University of Applied Sciences https://www.internet-sicherheit.de _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs