From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:39:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD63B60.3070708@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339425583-54949-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On 06/11/12 09:39, Brian Foster wrote:
> An inode in the AIL can be flush locked and marked stale if
> a cluster free transaction occurs at the right time. The
> inode item is then marked as flushing, which causes xfsaild
> to spin and leaves the filesystem stalled. This is
> reproduced by running xfstests 273 in a loop for an
> extended period of time.
>
> Check for stale inodes before the flush lock. This marks
> the inode as pinned, leads to a log flush and allows the
> filesystem to proceed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster<bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> This patch resolves the stall I was reproducing with the 273 loop test.
> I repeated the test pretty much throughout the weekend. I still hit one
> hung task timeout message, but the test proceeded through it.
>
> Dave, I know you mentioned you were sending a similar patch. Either you
> didn't get to it or I missed it, but here's what I've been testing....
>
> Brian
>
Still hangs right away on Linux 3.5rc1 using a very small log and the
perl test program.
I will investigate more.
Darn, the printk routines in Linux 3.5 added a "struct log" and crash is
finding that definition.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 14:39 [PATCH] xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push Brian Foster
2012-06-11 18:39 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-06-12 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-12 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-15 12:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-18 14:29 ` Mark Tinguely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD63B60.3070708@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox