From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:29:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF3B4F.7050901@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339425583-54949-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On 06/11/12 09:39, Brian Foster wrote:
> An inode in the AIL can be flush locked and marked stale if
> a cluster free transaction occurs at the right time. The
> inode item is then marked as flushing, which causes xfsaild
> to spin and leaves the filesystem stalled. This is
> reproduced by running xfstests 273 in a loop for an
> extended period of time.
>
> Check for stale inodes before the flush lock. This marks
> the inode as pinned, leads to a log flush and allows the
> filesystem to proceed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster<bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> This patch resolves the stall I was reproducing with the 273 loop test.
> I repeated the test pretty much throughout the weekend. I still hit one
> hung task timeout message, but the test proceeded through it.
>
> Dave, I know you mentioned you were sending a similar patch. Either you
> didn't get to it or I missed it, but here's what I've been testing....
>
> Brian
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
Your patch looks good. Considered it also:
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
As far as problem 2. Small logs can still get stuck. I have seen
hang B in 576K-1MB sized logs, I have not larger logs hard enough
to see where the problem will start to occur.
A) Test like the problem replicator
(http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=922)
will quickly hang because the test can get into a situation where
there are no new transactions to push the AIL and the sync
worker's allocation of the dummy transaction is hung behind these
requests.
This is mostly a limit of the test. Any filesystem activity that is
not related to the test will restart the filesystem. My earlier
posted patch that restarts the AIL cleaning when there are still
waiters after the last tail move will help this situation.
B) Keep pushing the log long enough and there will be a hard hang with
an empty AIL
1) Large request for log. (typically about 340K)
a) some free space but not enough for first request
2) AIL is empty
3) Remaining space (not quite half the log) is in CIL
a) current CTX is too small for passive CIL push (just less than log
size / 8)
b) remaining space is in the current CTX ticket and a previously
pushed CTX sequence.
i) No leaks.
ii) I have not worked out why the previously pushed CTX has not
been written out. The iclog looks unlocked and ACTIVE.
4) The sync worker is blocked on the dummy transaction allocation and
cannot not push the CIL again.
Sorry this machine will not kdump.
--Mark Tinguely
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 14:39 [PATCH] xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push Brian Foster
2012-06-11 18:39 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-06-12 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-12 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-15 12:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-18 14:29 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDF3B4F.7050901@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox