From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5JHhL3O132478 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:43:21 -0500 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VtQ6BXb2YUiL8km8 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2999F6C0B6 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:43:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4FE0BA38.4010505@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:43:20 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: wiki spam References: <20120618133323.GA11845@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120618133323.GA11845@infradead.org> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 6/18/2012 8:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I just had to delete dozends of link farm spam entries on the xfs.org. > > This is getting a bit out of control, so I'm wondring what we can do > about it. > > I wonder if it's reasonable only to hand out account if a user manually > contacts one of the admins. I don't want the bar high, just proving > to be able to writing a human person mail basically. Perfectly reasonable. Quite frankly I was surprised long ago when I learned it was totally open, given the small size of the XFS community, and the opportunity for mischief, or just factual errors, ala many Wikipedia articles. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs