From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5R2736n161515 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:07:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6F433mD2dB6jHvIR for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FEA6AA4.1@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:06:28 -0400 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs states log stripe unit is too large References: <20120623234445.GZ19223@dastard> <4FE67970.2030008@sandeen.net> <4FE710B7.5010704@hardwarefreak.com> <20120626023059.GC19223@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20120626023059.GC19223@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ingo_J=FCrgensmann?= , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 6/25/12 10:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > Without the warning, nobody would have noticed this. I think the > warning has value - even if it is just to indicate MD now uses a > bad default value for common workloads.. Fair enough. log stripe unit (524288 bytes) is too large (maximum is 256KiB) log stripe unit adjusted to 32KiB It just tweaked me a little to complain about something the user didn't specify, but thinking about it from the perspective of letting the user know that the _device_ has a stripe unit larger than xfs can handle makes sense. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs