From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q61EsDVS090682 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:54:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9ckMntfOUYfbXvCU for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 07:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FF06480.6030109@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:53:52 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Ext4 and xfs problems in dm-thin on allocation and discard References: <4FDF9EBE.2030809@shiftmail.org> <20120619015745.GJ25389@dastard> <4FE1BDF3.4080702@shiftmail.org> <20120620225327.GL30705@dastard> <20120621174742.GA27837@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120621174742.GA27837@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org, device-mapper development , Spelic , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Il 21/06/2012 19:47, Mike Snitzer ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini fixed blkdev_issue_discard to properly align some time > ago; unfortunately the patches slipped through the cracks (cc'ing Paolo, > Jens, and Christoph). > > Here are references to Paolo's patches: > 0/2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/14/323 > 1/2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/14/324 > 2/2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/14/325 > > Patch 2/2 specifically addresses the case where: > discard_max_bytes == discard_granularity > > Paolo, any chance you could resend to Jens (maybe with hch's comments on > patch#2 accounted for)? Also, please add hch's Reviewed-by when > reposting. Sure, I'll do it this week. I just need to retest. Paolo _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs