From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, zlang@redhat.com
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] common: fix _require_xfs_io_command pwrite -A for various blocksizes
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:48:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e8a9b373fdfeecd3e0de2a91ecdd75fbb94e18e.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <176054618045.2391029.13403718073912452422.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Wed, 2025-10-15 at 09:38 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> In this predicate, we should test an atomic write of the minimum
> supported size, not just 4k. This fixes a problem where none of the
> atomic write tests actually run on a 32k-fsblock xfs because you can't
> do a sub-fsblock atomic write.
>
> Cc: <fstests@vger.kernel.org> # v2025.04.13
> Fixes: d90ee3b6496346 ("generic: add a test for atomic writes")
> Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
> common/rc | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 1b78cd0c358bb9..dcae5bc33b19ce 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -3030,16 +3030,24 @@ _require_xfs_io_command()
> "pwrite")
> # -N (RWF_NOWAIT) only works with direct vectored I/O writes
> local pwrite_opts=" "
> + local write_size="4k"
> if [ "$param" == "-N" ]; then
> opts+=" -d"
> - pwrite_opts+="-V 1 -b 4k"
> + pwrite_opts+="-V 1 -b $write_size"
Nit: We can still keep this to 4k (or any random size and not necessarily a size = fsblocksize),
right?
> fi
> if [ "$param" == "-A" ]; then
> opts+=" -d"
> - pwrite_opts+="-V 1 -b 4k"
> + # try to write the minimum supported atomic write size
> + write_size="$($XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "statx -r -m $STATX_WRITE_ATOMIC" $testfile 2>/dev/null | \
> + grep atomic_write_unit_min | \
> + grep -o '[0-9]\+')"
> + if [ -z "$write_size" ] || [ "$write_size" = "0" ]; then
> + write_size="0 --not-supported"
> + fi
> + pwrite_opts+="-V 1 -b $write_size"
> fi
> testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -f $opts -c \
> - "pwrite $pwrite_opts $param 0 4k" $testfile 2>&1`
> + "pwrite $pwrite_opts $param 0 $write_size" $testfile 2>&1`
This looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> param_checked="$pwrite_opts $param"
> ;;
> "scrub"|"repair")
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 16:36 [PATCHSET] fstests: more random fixes for v2025.10.05 Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-15 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] generic/427: try to ensure there's some free space before we do the aio test Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 14:16 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-20 18:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-15 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] common/rc: fix _require_xfs_io_shutdown Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-24 7:31 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-24 22:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 6:31 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-15 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] generic/742: avoid infinite loop if no fiemap results Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-15 16:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] generic/{482,757}: skip test if there are no FUA writes Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-17 16:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-20 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-15 16:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] generic/772: actually check for file_getattr special file support Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-17 17:46 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 22:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-18 7:57 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-20 16:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-24 7:44 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-24 22:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 6:05 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-30 16:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-15 16:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] common/filter: fix _filter_file_attributes to handle xfs file flags Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-17 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-20 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-21 5:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-21 14:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-15 16:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] common/attr: fix _require_noattr2 Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-17 17:13 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 22:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-18 14:43 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-20 16:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-24 9:01 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-24 22:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 6:02 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-15 16:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] common: fix _require_xfs_io_command pwrite -A for various blocksizes Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 4:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-24 9:18 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) [this message]
2025-10-24 22:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 6:03 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e8a9b373fdfeecd3e0de2a91ecdd75fbb94e18e.camel@gmail.com \
--to=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).