public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] xfs: wait for the write of the superblock on unmount
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:03:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500EAB38.5080702@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120724135758.GA6564@infradead.org>

On 07/24/12 08:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:33:58PM -0500, tinguely@sgi.com wrote:
>> Sorry, I have been distracted away from this regression. This was previously
>> titled "xfs: synchronously write the superblock on unmount".
>>
>> xfs_wait_buftarg() does not wait for the completion of the write of the
>> uncached superblock. This write can race with the shutdown of the log and
>> causes a panic if the write does not win the race.
>>
>> The log write of the superblock is important for possible recovery, but a
>> second syncronous write of the same superblock seems redundant. Would just
>> waiting for the iodone() of the log write before tearing down the log be
>> enough?
>
> This doesn't look beautiful, but I suspect there's no good way around
> it.  Can you add your explanation from the reply on why xfs_buf_iowait
> does not work here to the comment above the lock/unlock pair?
>
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>

Thank-you. I will repost with the same xfs_buf_lock() entry to 
xfs_quiesce_attr().

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-24 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120717215957.855744999@tinguelysgi.com>
2012-07-18 17:33 ` [RFC] xfs: wait for the write of the superblock on unmount tinguely
2012-07-19  1:58   ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-20 13:21     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-20 21:24       ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-24 13:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-24 14:03     ` Mark Tinguely [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500EAB38.5080702@sgi.com \
    --to=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox