From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:30:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501162A8.8090106@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120704151328.928543446@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 07/04/2012 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This series should fix the (false-positive) lockdep warnings Sage
> has seen while testing ceph workloads with heavy attr usage.
>
> Btw, you probably should create the XFS filesystems for Ceph usage
> with large inodes to avoid going out of line for the attributes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
I really liked the way this patch series was broken up. As I am new to
the XFS group, this was very educational to review. Nice job Christoph.
--Rich
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 15:13 [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-04 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: clean up xfs_inactive Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 15:30 ` Rich Johnston
2012-07-04 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove xfs_inactive_attrs Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 15:31 ` Rich Johnston
2012-07-04 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: do not take the iolock in xfs_inactive Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 15:31 ` Rich Johnston
2012-07-04 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: avoid the iolock in xfs_free_eofblocks for evicted inodes Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 15:31 ` Rich Johnston
2012-07-04 15:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove iolock lock classes Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 15:31 ` Rich Johnston
2012-07-06 0:05 ` [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context Sage Weil
[not found] ` <20120717071923.GD15473@infradead.org>
2012-07-17 15:46 ` Sage Weil
2012-07-17 17:27 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-26 15:30 ` Rich Johnston [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501162A8.8090106@sgi.com \
--to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox