From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q6QFVAc8048335 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:31:10 -0500 Message-ID: <501162C2.5020506@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:31:14 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: avoid the iolock in xfs_free_eofblocks for evicted inodes References: <20120704151328.928543446@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120704151444.136872347@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120704151444.136872347@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 07/04/2012 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Same rational as the last patch - these inodes are not reachable, so > don't bother with locking. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c Next step in removing the iolocks. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs