From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: merge xfs_ialloc_ag_select into xfs_dialloc
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:21:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016C27C.9060700@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501182AE.2090109@sgi.com>
On 07/26/12 12:47, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>
>
> + if (pass < 2) {
> + /*
> + * Is there enough free space for the file plus a block
> + * of inodes?
> + */
> + xfs_extlen_t longest = pag->pagf_longest;
> + int needspace =
> + S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode);
> +
> + if (!longest)
> + longest = pag->pagf_flcount > 0;
> +
> + if (pag->pagf_freeblks <
> + XFS_IALLOC_BLOCKS(mp) + needspace)
> + goto nextag;
> ^^^^^^^ here
>
> + if (longest < XFS_IALLOC_BLOCKS(mp))
> + goto nextag;
>
> ^^^^^^^ and here
> + }
>
> Isn't the agbp locked from the earlier xfs_ialloc_read_agi()?
> Do we want to release them before going on to the next AG?
>
> Thank-you,
>
> --Mark.
>
same line of thought as above:
+ if (!pag->pagf_init) {
+ int flags = pass ? 0 : XFS_ALLOC_FLAG_TRYLOCK;
+
+ error = xfs_alloc_pagf_init(mp, tp, agno, flags);
+ if (error)
+ goto out_error;
+ }
Also, don't we still have the AGI buffer locked when we try to
initialize the AGF? If the AGF initialization fails, do we need to also
unlock the AGI buffer before returning?
Thank-you.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-30 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 14:54 [PATCH 0/7] inode allocator refactoring V2 Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: remove xfs_ialloc_find_free Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: split xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-29 20:55 ` Ben Myers
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: remove the alloc_done argument to xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:48 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add a short cut to xfs_dialloc for the non-NULL agbp case Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:50 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: refactor xfs_ialloc_ag_select Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: do not read the AGI buffer in xfs_dialloc until nessecary Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: merge xfs_ialloc_ag_select into xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:47 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-30 17:21 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-05 14:46 [PATCH 0/7] inode allocator refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-05 14:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: merge xfs_ialloc_ag_select into xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-18 3:10 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5016C27C.9060700@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox