From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q6VGwKo5200664 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:58:21 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oTnBkdZ6mOsZyVkH for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (liberator.sandeen.net [10.0.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660D34963292 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:58:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <50180EAB.8030008@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:58:19 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: xfstests git trees are drifting a little List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss kernel.org & oss.sgi.com have gotten a bit out of sync, I think. Are there plans to address this soon, on either side? xfstests vs. xfstests-dev: 016 | 9 030 | 3 030.out.linux | 1 273 | 10 274 | 70 ++--- 285 | 58 ---- 285.full | 116 -------- 285.out | 1 286 | 114 -------- 286.full | 70 ----- 286.out | 1 README | 4 common.attr | 4 common.dump | 2 group | 2 src/Makefile | 3 src/seek_copy_test.c | 249 ----------------- src/seek_sanity_test.c | 683 ------------------------------------------------- -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs