From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7HIFjpN074655 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:15:45 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 61d5NdRTgIeprSoE for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macmini.sandeen.net (macmini.sandeen.net [10.0.0.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sandeen) by mail.sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EB14F32D84 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:15:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <502E8A4F.9050105@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:15:43 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS regression: Oops in xfs_buf_do_callbacks on xfstest 137 References: <501ABC84.6030708@sandeen.net> <20120817180254.GA15382@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120817180254.GA15382@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/17/12 1:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd be this is my new code added to xfs_buf_item_unpin, but I don't > quite understand why. It's been a long time since I wrote that code, > but I had to add that code to make sure we clear all buffers during > a forced shutdown. Can you test if things go away if you just remove it > (even if causes other hangs?) It does go away AFAIK, since the bisect found it. Sadly it's been on the back burner for me, under other deadline pressure. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs