From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7L9CDlc060129 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:12:13 -0500 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qUVgvd5Yqs4c9YSa (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q7L9CAdM022339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:12:11 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7L9CA0W001550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:12:10 GMT Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q7L9C931017440 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:12:09 -0500 Message-ID: <503350B5.1010505@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:11:17 +0800 From: Jeff Liu MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH v8 0/4] xfs: seek_data/seek_hole refinements Reply-To: jeff.liu@oracle.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hello, Here is the updated patch set of refine xfs_seek_data/xfs_seek_hole with page cache lookup for unwritten extents. Hopefully, this version is qualified to be merged. :) Changes from v8 to v7: - xfs_find_get_pgoff() . Sample the next page index without page lock. Also, add comments to clarify why it's safe to check page->index without page lock. . Remove (pgoff_t) PAGEVEC_SIZE. - xfs_seek_data()/xfs_seek_hole(), ASSERT(i > 1). Old version: Version 7 of this posting can be found at http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg13171.html Version 6 of this posting can be found at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-08/msg00028.html Version 5 of this posting can be found at http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg12987.html Version 4 of this posting can be found at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-07/msg00279.html Version 3 of this posting can be found at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-07/msg00050.html Version 2 of this posting can be found at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00407.html Version 1 of this posting can be found at http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/11980/26875/ Thanks, -Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs