From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Boris Ranto <ranto.boris@gmail.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add test case to test xfs projid32bit functionality a bit more extensively.
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:48:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504EB4AB.4050100@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120911034510.GA11511@dastard>
On 9/10/12 10:45 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:47:03PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 9/6/12 10:23 AM, Boris Ranto wrote:
>>> The test covers several areas including enabling projid32bit
>>> functionality dynamically by xfs_admin, dumping, restoring, quota
>>> reporting and xfs_db projid values reporting.
>>> This test case hits a bug with xfsdump/xfsrestore process on a
>>> projid32bit enabled filesystem.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ranto <ranto.boris@gmail.com>
>>
>> there are just a couple things below, but I think we can get it
>> checked in unless Dave has further concerns - please see below.
> ....
>>> +dir=$SCRATCH_MNT/pquota
>>> +
>>> +status=1
>>> +
>>> +mkdir -p $dir
>>> +touch $dir/{16,32}less
>>
>> Although I understand it ok, I might add a comment here saying:
>>
>> # create files to hold 16 and 32-bit project IDs
>>
>> In retrospect I might use 16bit and 32bit to make more sense.
>> Sorry, should have suggested that earlier.
>>
>> I could just change the names on checkin with a note if that's ok with you.
>
> With that change to 16bit/32bit, it's fine by me.
>
>>> @@ -403,3 +403,4 @@ deprecated
>>> 282 dump ioctl auto quick
>>> 283 dump ioctl auto quick
>>> 284 auto
>>> +285 auto dump quota
>
> Like I mentione dfirst time around, it needs to be added to the
> quick group as well.
oops missed that.
> If you make those changes, Eric, then consider it:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
I'll fix those up & commit.
thanks,
-Eric
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 15:23 [PATCH v3] Add test case to test xfs projid32bit functionality a bit more extensively Boris Ranto
2012-09-11 2:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-11 3:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-11 3:45 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-11 3:48 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504EB4AB.4050100@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=ranto.boris@gmail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox