From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8DIVs2Y199335 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:31:54 -0500 Message-ID: <505226CF.2030608@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:32:47 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/102]: xfs: 3.0.x stable kernel update References: <1345698180-13612-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1345698180-13612-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 08/23/12 00:01, Dave Chinner wrote: > For all the XFS developers that have copious amounts of free time > available, I'd appreciate an eye run over the patch list to see if > there's any potential bug fixes that I missed or have made glaring > errors in backporting. Some of the fixes are dependent on cleanups I > haven't included, so some of the patches are a bit different to what > is in mainline (e.g. anything that touches setattr). Most important > to look at is probably the inode i_size changes and the logging of > all metadata changes. I think Brian Foster's log hang patch would be a good candidate: xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00134.html This hang can happen in Linux 2.6.x version of XFS. Thanks for the work. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs