From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8QKJ6JS249706 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:19:06 -0500 Message-ID: <50636384.1010803@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:20:20 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] xfs: make inode64 as the default allocation mode References: <1348147961-7520-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> <1348147961-7520-3-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1348147961-7520-3-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Carlos Maiolino Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/20/12 08:32, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > since 64-bit inodes can be accessed while using inode32, and these can also be > used on 32-bit kernels, there is no reason to still keep inode32 as the default > mount option. > If the filesystem cannot handle 64bit inode numbers (i.e CONFIG_LBDAF is not > enabled and BITS_PER_LONG == 32), XFS_MOUNT_SMALL_INUMS will still be set by > default, so inode64 is not an unconditional default value. > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino > --- Looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs