From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q91DieuD130220 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:44:40 -0500 Message-ID: <50699E95.7020905@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:45:57 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 068: Add mmap load References: <50651A99.1070307@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50651A99.1070307@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On 09/27/12 22:33, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Test 068 is the go-to test for freeze deadlock coverage; > unfortunately it only uses fsstress, which doesn't do any mmap > IO. > > Using the existing fstest binary gets us a cheap mmap exerciser > as well. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > --- > > I think it's fair to modify this test vs. making a new one - > it's never passed yet, and will only start passing in kernel 3.6, > so it shouldn't cause new test regressions to add mmap ops. > > And I can verify that this finds mmap bugs; I had a backport > which messed up ext4's freeze vs. mmap handling, and this exposes > it. :) > Committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfs.git, master branch. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs