From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q92KmBKx085184 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:48:12 -0500 Received: from vwp1161.webpack.hosteurope.de (vwp1161.webpack.hosteurope.de [87.230.104.173]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id P80yJ1vAVTcFFWdC for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <506B5357.6060609@blafoo.org> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:49:27 +0200 From: Volker MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: OOM on quotacheck (again?) References: <5059D2B4.8010300@blafoo.org> <20120919205924.GC31501@dastard> <505AE2A1.5060703@blafoo.org> <20120924132113.GL20960@dastard> <5060727D.4000009@blafoo.org> <506B1667.4010203@blafoo.org> <20121002200946.GP23520@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20121002200946.GP23520@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, >> If its of any interest, i can supply the stack-traces. > > Yes, it is of interest, can you post everything you found out about > the problem? (dmesg, stack traces, repair output, etc). Everything posted here is from a single server and its chronologically top to bottom. Without having checked each and every stacktrace, it looked quite similar on the other servers. http://pastebin.com/PXquE4sM Sidenote: The xfs_repair would not finish without supplying -P, otherwise the repair hang in phase 6 (might be related to this bug: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs-masters/2011-01/msg00009.html) Hope it helps! Since we have about 300 servers left to go from 2.6.37 to 3.6, i'd be happy to do some testing as long we are not gambling with our customers data :-) - volker _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs