From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q95HwMmf080867 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:58:22 -0500 Message-ID: <506F2013.7080606@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:59:47 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [patch v4 07/13] [PATCH 07/13] xfs: syncd workqueue is no more References: <20121005171853.985930109@sgi.com> <20121005171946.545918929@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20121005171946.545918929@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 10/05/12 12:19, Ben Myers wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > With the syncd functions moved to the log and/or removed, the syncd > workqueue is the only remaining bit left. It is used by the log > covering/ail pushing work, as well as by the inode reclaim work. > > Given how cheap workqueues are these days, give the log and inode > reclaim work their own work queues and kill the syncd work queue. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- Looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs