From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant.
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:15:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506F23D9.6090405@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005180446.GN25175@sgi.com>
On 10/05/12 13:04, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 12:55:45PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> On 10/05/12 12:18, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
>>> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
>>> @@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>>> #endif
>>> struct xfs_mru_cache *m_filestream; /* per-mount filestream data */
>>> struct delayed_work m_reclaim_work; /* background inode reclaim */
>>> - struct work_struct m_flush_work; /* background inode flush */
>>> __int64_t m_update_flags; /* sb flags we need to update
>>> on the next remount,rw */
>>> struct shrinker m_inode_shrink; /* inode reclaim shrinker */
>>> @@ -381,6 +380,27 @@ extern int xfs_dev_is_read_only(struct x
>>>
>>> extern void xfs_set_low_space_thresholds(struct xfs_mount *);
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Flush all dirty data to disk. Must not be called while holding an XFS_ILOCK
>>> + * or a page lock.
>>> + *
>>> + * We have to hold the s_umount lock here, but because this call can nest
>>> + * inside i_mutex (the parent directory in the create case, held by the VFS),
>>> + * we have to use down_read_trylock() to avoid potential deadlocks. In
>>> + * practice, this trylock will succeed on almost every attempt as
>>> + * unmount/remount type operations are exceedingly rare.
>>> + */
>>> +static inline void
>>> +xfs_flush_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct super_block *sb = mp->m_super;
>>> +
>>> + if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
>>> + sync_inodes_sb(sb);
>>> + up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>>
>> Was this suppose to be in xfs_inode.h? Otherwise....
>
> Christoph suggested that xfs_flush_inodes should take an xfs_mount instead of
> an inode. It is operating on the super_block level to flush multiple inodes
> rather than the single inode whose pointer was passed in, so I moved it from
> xfs_inode.h to xfs_mount.h.
>
> Regards,
> Ben
You are right - that is where it belongs with the inode->mount parameter
change. Sorry for the noise.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 17:18 [patch v4 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 01/13] [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_syncd_stop must die Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 02/13] [PATCH 02/13] xfs: rationalise xfs_mount_wq users Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 03/13] [PATCH 03/13] xfs: dont run the sync work if the filesystem is Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 04/13] [PATCH 04/13] xfs: sync work is now only periodic log work Ben Myers
2012-10-05 18:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-05 18:31 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 05/13] [PATCH 05/13] xfs: Bring some sanity to log unmounting Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:55 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 18:04 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-05 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-05 18:15 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 07/13] [PATCH 07/13] xfs: syncd workqueue is no more Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:59 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 08/13] [PATCH 08/13] xfs: xfs_sync_fsdata is redundant Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 09/13] [PATCH 09/13] xfs: move xfs_quiesce_attr() into xfs_super.c Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 10/13] [PATCH 10/13] xfs: xfs_quiesce_attr() should quiesce the log like Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 11/13] [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rename xfs_sync.[ch] to xfs_icache.[ch] Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 12/13] [PATCH 12/13] xfs: move inode locking functions to xfs_inode.c Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 13/13] [PATCH 13/13] xfs: remove xfs_iget.c Ben Myers
2012-10-06 1:31 ` [patch v4 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Dave Chinner
2012-10-06 17:37 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-08 0:33 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506F23D9.6090405@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox