From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant.
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:23:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074A3DB.7010007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009214144.GU13214@sgi.com>
On 10/09/2012 05:41 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:28:51AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:01:24PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> Hi Brain,
>>
>> [Pinky: "Gee, Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
>> Brain: "The same thing we do every night, Pinky - try to take over
>> the world!"]
>
> Wish I could say I called him 'brain' on purpose. Will you be playing the part
> of Pinky in today's show? ;)
>
Heh, it happens more than you would think. ;)
>>> Given that you found the regression in the output of xfstest 273, could you
>>> do us a favor and review the fix and provide your Reviewed-by, and/or
>>> Tested-by?
>>
>> Brian did test it, just as separate patches:
>>
>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00037.html
>
> Brian, would you mind extending your Tested-by?
>
Sure, I tested Dave's change to xfs_flush_inodes() against 273 and ran
another full test against the entire v3 set on that hardware, without
any further noticeable issues.
Tested-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Brian
> Regards,
> Ben
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 10:55 [PATCH 00/14 V5]: xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:55 ` [PATCH 01/14] xfs: xfs_syncd_stop must die Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 02/14] xfs: rationalise xfs_mount_wq users Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 03/14] xfs: don't run the sync work if the filesystem is read-only Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 04/14] xfs: sync work is now only periodic log work Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 05/14] xfs: Bring some sanity to log unmounting Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 06/14] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 21:01 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-09 21:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 21:41 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-09 22:23 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2012-10-09 22:54 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: syncd workqueue is no more Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 08/14] xfs: xfs_sync_fsdata is redundant Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 09/14] xfs: move xfs_quiesce_attr() into xfs_super.c Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 10/14] xfs: xfs_quiesce_attr() should quiesce the log like unmount Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 11/14] xfs: rename xfs_sync.[ch] to xfs_icache.[ch] Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 12/14] xfs: move inode locking functions to xfs_inode.c Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: remove xfs_iget.c Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: only update the last_sync_lsn when a transaction completes Dave Chinner
2012-10-10 14:28 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-10 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-08 22:39 ` [PATCH 00/14 V5]: xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Ben Myers
2012-10-11 2:31 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-11 5:03 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-16 18:19 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-10 21:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-11 1:51 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-16 19:19 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-17 19:24 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5074A3DB.7010007@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox