From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q9LKTaBr245167 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:29:36 -0500 Message-ID: <50845B8C.4050203@sgi.com> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:31:08 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking References: <1349446636-8611-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> <5081BFFF.70603@sgi.com> <50840003.406@redhat.com> <5084368F.3000204@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <5084368F.3000204@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 10/21/12 12:53, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > Not at all a big deal, (16 used and 12 padding = ) 28 bytes was an > odd number and it got my curiosity up. I suspected it was part a plan > of yours and Pinky to take over the world. :) > Ha-ha. never-mind. I am foiled again by my inability to count past 4, or stupidity of counting using diff files. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs