public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:07:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508E3940.4080200@univ-nantes.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121028234802.GE4353@dastard>

Le 29/10/2012 00:48, Dave Chinner a écrit :
>
> This is reproductible. Here is how to do it :
>
> - Started a 3.6.2 kernel.
>
> - I created a fresh lvm volume on localdisk of 20 GB.
> Can you reproduce the problem without LVM?

Hello dave. That is THE question. My intent was to test with and without 
LVM. But right now I can't , because all my disks are consumed by lvm.
In fact my test setup hasn't even enough space to locally clone the 
volume where I have errors. I only have 146 sas disks on this machine.

I have to setup another test platform, and as I'm currently traveling, 
it won't be easy before  next week.

What I want to try this week is to recrash a volume, possibly smaller,
download this image on another machine with kvm
see if I have the mounting problems inside this kvm
begin to bisect the kernel .

...
>
> - After some try, I finally had the impossibility to mount the xfs
> volume, with the error reported in previous mails. So far this is
> normal .
> So it doesn't happen every time, and it may be power cycle related.

Yes, during my tests, I had to to power cycle 3 or 4 times before having 
the actual problem

> What is your "local disk"?

Raid 1 array (2 disks) with mptsas on this.
>
>> xfs_logprint don't say much :
>>
>> xfs_logprint:
>>      data device: 0xfe02
>>      log device: 0xfe02 daddr: 10485792 length: 20480
>>
>> Header 0x7c wanted 0xfeedbabe
>> **********************************************************************
>> * ERROR: header cycle=124         block=5414 *
>> **********************************************************************
> You didn't look past the initial error, did you? The file is only
> 482280 lines long, and 482200 lines of that are decoded log data....
> :)
Well I'd tried with -c  but sorry, i didn't had experience with 
xfs_logprint so far.
>
>> I tried xfs_logprint -c , it gaves a 22M file. You can grab it here :
>> http://filex.univ-nantes.fr/get?k=QnBXivz2J3LmzJ18uBV
> I really need the raw log data, not the parsed output. The logprint
> command to do that is "-C <file>", not "-c".

Ok ... I should have read the man page more carefully. Time to restart a 
crash session

>> - Rebooted 3.4.15
>> - xfs_logprint gives the exact same result that with 3.6.2 (diff
>> tells no differences)
> Given that it's generated by the logprint application, I'd expect it
> to be identical.
Me too, but I'd also expect the log replaying to be identical between 
the 2 kernels

>
>> but on 3.4.15, I can mount the volume without problem, log is
>> replayed.
>> for information here is xfs_info of the volume :
>>
>> here is xfs_info output
>>
>> root@label5:/mnt/debug# xfs_info /mnt/tempo
>> meta-data=/dev/mapper/LocalDisk-crashdisk isize=256    agcount=8,
>> agsize=655360 blks
> How did you get a default of 8 AGs? That seems wrong.  What version
> of mkfs.xfs are you using?
root@label5:~# mkfs.xfs -V
mkfs.xfs version 3.1.7

the volume was freshly formatted, with defaults options. Absolutely 
nothing special on my side.
Cheers,

-- 
Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Université de Nantes
Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-29  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-22 14:14 Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ? Yann Dupont
2012-10-23  8:24 ` Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?) Yann Dupont
2012-10-25 15:21   ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-25 20:55     ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-25 21:10     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-26 10:03       ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-26 22:05         ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-28 23:48           ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-29  1:25             ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-29  8:11               ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-29 12:21                 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-29 12:18               ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-29 12:43                 ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-30  1:33                   ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 11:45                     ` Gaudenz Steinlin
2012-11-05 13:57                     ` Yann Dupont
2012-10-29  8:07             ` Yann Dupont [this message]
2012-10-29  8:17               ` Yann Dupont
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-28  9:39 reste donewell
2012-11-28 20:37 ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508E3940.4080200@univ-nantes.fr \
    --to=yann.dupont@univ-nantes.fr \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox