From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q9T8FQTv145005 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:15:26 -0500 Received: from smtp-tls.univ-nantes.fr (smtptls1-loi.cpub.univ-nantes.fr [193.52.103.112]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5V0BqCiH45pPDeox for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-tls.univ-nantes.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198E24016E4 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:17:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-tls.univ-nantes.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtptls1-loi.cpub.univ-nantes.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7Tjl2+we4sSq for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:17:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:2001:660:7220:0:1cf5:475e:2845:4f5e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:660:7220:0:1cf5:475e:2845:4f5e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-tls.univ-nantes.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFCE24016E0 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:17:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <508E3B89.2070004@univ-nantes.fr> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:17:13 +0100 From: Yann Dupont MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?) References: <508554AF.5050005@univ-nantes.fr> <50865453.5080708@univ-nantes.fr> <508958FF.4000007@univ-nantes.fr> <20121025211047.GD29378@dastard> <508A600C.1020109@univ-nantes.fr> <508B092E.6070209@univ-nantes.fr> <20121028234802.GE4353@dastard> <508E3940.4080200@univ-nantes.fr> In-Reply-To: <508E3940.4080200@univ-nantes.fr> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Le 29/10/2012 09:07, Yann Dupont a =E9crit : > > Hello dave. That is THE question. My intent was to test with and = > without LVM. But right now I can't , because all my disks are consumed = > by lvm. > In fact my test setup hasn't even enough space to locally clone the = > volume where I have errors. I only have 146 sas disks on this machine. whoooops read 146 GB sas disks If I really had 146 sas disks on that machine I shouldn't have disk = space problems :) Cheers, -- = Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Universit=E9 de Nantes Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs