From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qA9ET6WY116297 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:29:06 -0600 Message-ID: <509D139F.1050607@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:30:55 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test References: <1350825309-30733-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com> <20121109032551.GA28325@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121109032551.GA28325@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Zheng Liu Cc: Jeff Liu , Zheng Liu , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/08/12 21:25, Zheng Liu wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0800, wenqing.lz wrote: > > ping? > > Regards, > Zheng > >> From: Zheng Liu >> >> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing. Thus we couldn't get the >> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285). >> >> CC: Jeff Liu >> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu >> --- >> v2<- v1: >> * put return value check below the run_test() >> >> Hi Jeff, >> >> Could you please review this patch again? Thanks. >> >> Regards, >> Zheng >> >> src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c >> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644 >> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c >> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c >> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >> goto out; >> >> for (i = 0; i< numtests; ++i) { >> + ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]); >> if (ret) >> - goto out; >> - run_test(&seek_tests[i]); >> + break; >> } >> >> out: >> -- >> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e >> > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs Hi Jeff and Zheng, Jeff, can I assume by your email: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00412.html that you are giving your Reviewed-by:? It also looks good to me too: Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely I will make sure it gets committed. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs