From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qAEIXPbt155509 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:33:25 -0600 Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21-nlb.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.207]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997318F8033 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:35:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50A3E46E.9040508@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:35:26 -0600 From: Andrew Dahl MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [patch 2/2 V2] xfstests: xfs_tosspages() test addition References: <20121108222315.505370321@sgi.com> <20121108222315.709683665@sgi.com> <20121108232726.GV6434@dastard> <50A19EC0.4040405@sgi.com> <50A3DC58.4080704@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <50A3DC58.4080704@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/14/2012 12:00 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 11/12/12 19:13, Andrew Dahl wrote: >> >> Tests the XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE ioctl by way of the "xfs_io zero" utility >> to ensure it is tossing the expected ranges. >> >> The ranges tested are [0,1] [0,4095] [0,4096] [0,4097] [4095,8191] >> [4095,8192] [4095,8193] [4096,8192] [1024,4096] >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Dahl >> >> --- >> > > ... > > >> + >> + $XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -t -c "pwrite -S 0x41 0 4096" \ > > -F is deprecated in xfs_io. > > Looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely Actually... I just realized I neglected to add one change in there. The call to _require_xfs_io_zero doesn't exist, but should in common.rc I'll repost the patch with this included. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs