From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qALKAYtQ092059 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:34 -0600 Message-ID: <50AD35CF.2070404@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:13:03 -0600 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfstests: remove unused code and resolve warnings References: <50AD2A1A.6020500@sgi.com> <50AD2EDC.8040703@sgi.com> <3C41256C-AA1D-4328-9D1A-2CBF28215B5B@dhnet.us> In-Reply-To: <3C41256C-AA1D-4328-9D1A-2CBF28215B5B@dhnet.us> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeffrey Ellis Cc: Jan Kara , Mark Tinguely , Brian Foster , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" , Christoph Hellwig , "ftpadmin@kernel.org" , Ben Myers On 11/21/2012 01:58 PM, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Looks like not :( > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; xfs@oss.sgi.com > Action: failed > Status: 5.0.0 > Diagnostic-Code: X-Spam-&-Virus-Firewall; host oss.sgi.com > [192.48.182.195] > said: 550 5.7.1 >... Access > denied (in reply to MAIL FROM > command) > > I also got another reject that's too long to reprint here, but it looks > like the systems thinks I'm a spammer. AFAIK, I'm not on any blacklists. > I've never been rejected by a listserv before. > > Best, > J. > K I will pass this along. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs