From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qAQJ4kEe219142 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:04:46 -0600 Message-ID: <50B3BDD4.8070506@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:07:00 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers. References: <1353641065-14983-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/22/12 21:24, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Inode buffers do not need to be mapped as inodes are read or written > directly from/to the pages underlying the buffer. This fixes a > regression introduced by commit 611c994 ("xfs: make XBF_MAPPED the > default behaviour"). > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- Good catch. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs