From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A670E7F50 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:45:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FCF8F8033 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:45:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id aj0lJeo36EupsNZZ for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:45:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510834ED.2080404@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:45:33 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add agskip=value mount option References: <20130129153914.801475275@sgi.com> <20130129153914.976867239@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20130129153914.976867239@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: rjohnston@sgi.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, rjohnston@sgi.com wrote: Please do inline if possible? But anyway, although I've not looked at the patch itself yet, please also add this to Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt And not just the "what" but the "why" - why would a person use this? And how would they select the value? Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs