From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D6F7F4E for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:11:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C9E304059 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.65]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FgOywGMS5TUHRFID for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:11:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5109D289.1050708@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:10:17 +0800 From: Li Zefan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] Fix possible use after free with AIO References: <1359502081-20240-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20130130144535.GK4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130130144535.GK4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 2013/1/30 22:45, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:27:57AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> since nobody seem to have picked up any of the patches (at least >> nobody told me so), I've added acks I received to the patches and I'm >> sending them to Al for merging. Al, can you please merge these? Thanks. > > VFS part (4/4) picked; IMO at least ext* and xfs should go through the > filesystem trees. If ocfs2 folks don't pick fs/ocfs2 part, I'll grab > it as well - not sure how active their tree is these days... I would say just grab it. We've been sending bug fixes to ocfs2 mailing list since Aug 2012, but none was pushed into upstream. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs