From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Habets <thomas@habets.se>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 50% more blocks allocated than needed
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:07:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510AB2D5.2080600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+kHd+eRifnCVkri6TPKS9UcUpBSW9nPnCEz0a412vO_Aw8=Xw@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/31/2013 06:43 AM, Thomas Habets wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've had some files on an XFS filesystem that use way
> more blocks than they need.
>
> That is, st_size=50MB and st_blocks*512= about 68MB.
>
> The files were downloaded with wget on a somewhat unreliable 3G
> connection (50-500kBps) and sometimes defragging (xfs_fsr) fixes it,
> but
> sometimes not.
>
> If st_blocks*512<st_size then it could be sparse files, but this is
> the opposite. So... preallocation?
>
Yes, here's a thread (one of probably several examples) that discusses
the behavior and how the extra space is not permanent, but can hang
around for a bit:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00145.html
> "df" before and after deleting a bunch of these files shows that the
> st_blocks is what it cares about. Would the preallocation (if that's
> what it is) be reclaimed if the fs started to run out of space?
>
I don't think so at the moment, but preallocation is throttled as the
filesystem free space becomes more limited. We've recently added
speculative prealloc tracking that performs background trimming on a
timer controlled via:
/proc/sys/fs/xfs/speculative_prealloc_lifetime
... and can be used in the future to explicitly reclaim extra space
lying around when the filesystem is full.
Brian
> If not preallocation, then what?
>
> Note st_blocks is 134656 and xfs_bmap shows 97663 blocks.
>
> $ ls -l foo
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50000000 Jan 29 01:32 foo
> $ du -h foo
> 66M foo
> $ stat foo
> File: `foo'
> Size: 50000000 Blocks: 134656 IO Block: 4096 regular file
> Device: fe04h/65028d Inode: 68688483 Links: 1
> Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
> Access: 2013-01-30 18:56:18.603278346 +0000
> Modify: 2013-01-29 01:32:51.000000000 +0000
> Change: 2013-01-31 11:38:10.892330145 +0000
> Birth: -
> $ xfs_bmap foo
> foo:
> 0: [0..97663]: 44665840..44763503
>
> --
> typedef struct me_s {
> char name[] = { "Thomas Habets" };
> char email[] = { "thomas@habets.pp.se" };
> char kernel[] = { "Linux" };
> char *pgpKey[] = { "http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt" };
> char pgp[] = { "A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854" };
> char coolcmd[] = { "echo '. ./_&. ./_'>_;. ./_" };
> } me_t;
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 11:43 50% more blocks allocated than needed Thomas Habets
2013-01-31 18:07 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2013-01-31 18:28 ` Stefan Ring
2013-01-31 19:46 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510AB2D5.2080600@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@habets.se \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox