From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605597F5F for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:12:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD288F8049 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:12:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (mail-ia0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UZCPybvR5xuLFpLY (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:12:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z13so8280957iaz.2 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:12:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510FDDE5.4050103@inktank.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:12:21 -0600 From: Alex Elder MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: insert memory barriers before wake_up_bit() List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Sage Weil These two patches insert memory barriers in xfs_iunlock() and xfs_inode_item_unpin() before their calls to wake_up_bit(), to ensure just-queued processes are properly awakened. -Alex [PATCH 1/2] xfs: memory barrier before wake_up_bit() [PATCH 2/2] xfs: another memory barrier before wake_up_bit() _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs