From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] xfs: reorganize xfs_iomap_prealloc_size to remove indentation
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:08:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5127B438.8080707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5127A5E2.2070407@sgi.com>
On 02/22/2013 12:07 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 02/20/13 09:10, Brian Foster wrote:
>> The majority of xfs_iomap_prealloc_size() executes within the
>> check for lack of default I/O size. Reverse the logic to remove the
>> extra indentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster<bfoster@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers<bpm@sgi.com>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 63
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> index 912d83d..d914419 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
>> @@ -381,42 +381,43 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(
>> int nimaps)
>> {
>> xfs_fsblock_t alloc_blocks = 0;
>> + int shift = 0;
>> + int64_t freesp;
>
> ...
>
>> + freesp = mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks;
>
> ...
>
>> + /*
>> + * If we are still trying to allocate more space than is
>> + * available, squash the prealloc hard. This can happen if we
>> + * have a large file on a small filesystem and the above
>> + * lowspace thresholds are smaller than MAXEXTLEN.
>> + */
>> + while (alloc_blocks>= freesp)
>> + alloc_blocks>>= 4;
>
>
> Hi Brian, I am looking at your speculative preallocation quota
> throttling series.
>
> I know this code is from commit 4d559a3b. would this not be bad of
> freesp == 0?
>
Thanks. Hmm, I guess if freesp is 0 we'd hit an infinite loop
(irrespective of this patchset). We could change the comparison to >,
but I think the following would be more clear:
while (alloc_blocks && alloc_blocks >= freesp)
alloc_blocks >>= 4;
Thoughts? I'll send out a one-liner to bat around if that looks
reasonable. Good catch.
Brian
> --Mark.
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 15:10 [PATCH v4 0/6] speculative preallocation quota throttling Brian Foster
2013-02-20 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] xfs: reorganize xfs_iomap_prealloc_size to remove indentation Brian Foster
2013-02-22 17:07 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-02-22 18:08 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2013-02-22 18:22 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-02-20 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] xfs: push rounddown_pow_of_two() to after prealloc throttle Brian Foster
2013-02-20 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] xfs: pass xfs_dquot to xfs_qm_adjust_dqlimits() instead of xfs_disk_dquot_t Brian Foster
2013-02-20 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] xfs: xfs_dquot prealloc throttling watermarks and low free space Brian Foster
2013-02-20 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] xfs: add quota-driven speculative preallocation throttling Brian Foster
2013-02-25 21:44 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-02-25 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-25 22:38 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-02-20 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] xfs: xfs_iomap_prealloc_size() tracepoint Brian Foster
2013-02-22 20:09 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] speculative preallocation quota throttling Mark Tinguely
2013-02-23 1:50 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <512BC90A.4090206@sgi.com>
2013-02-25 20:47 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5127B438.8080707@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox