From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28157F87 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:50:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BDCAC002 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id q5AwGTYF6aJZ4t8U for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:50:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512EE20A.7010103@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:50:18 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Read corruption on ARM References: <512D3856.5050305@sandeen.net> <512D49E2.40003@sandeen.net> <512E3BB2.6060407@sandeen.net> <512E7639.20205@sandeen.net> <512E89C2.9000302@sandeen.net> <512E903A.2020405@sandeen.net> <512EDF37.4050802@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <512EDF37.4050802@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jason Detring , xfs-oss On 2/27/13 10:38 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: ... > re-cc'ing xfs list > > So I used pahole to look at all structs, objdump -d to disassemble, > and md5sum'd the results to see what's different. > > pi@raspberrypi ~ $ md5sum cross/*.dis cross/*.pahole native/*.dis native/*.pahole > > > > c0abd80c3bf049db5e1909fd851261cc cross/xfs-O1-g.ko.pahole > c0abd80c3bf049db5e1909fd851261cc cross/xfs-O2-g.ko.pahole > c0abd80c3bf049db5e1909fd851261cc cross/xfs-Os-g.ko.pahole > c0abd80c3bf049db5e1909fd851261cc native/xfs-O1-g.ko.pahole > c0abd80c3bf049db5e1909fd851261cc native/xfs-O2-g.ko.pahole > c0abd80c3bf049db5e1909fd851261cc native/xfs-Os-g.ko.pahole > > so all structures look identical, good - but: > > while disassembly of these two modules match: > > d76f6ebf4d8a1b9f786facefbcf16f69 cross/xfs-O1-g.ko.dis > d76f6ebf4d8a1b9f786facefbcf16f69 native/xfs-O1-g.ko.dis > > do you see the problem w/ the cross-compiled xfs-O1-g.ko as well? > > the others differ: > > 349f3490a49f2ce539c2b058914f64f0 native/xfs-Os-g.ko.dis > 91c8e8230774808b538c21a83106a5d7 cross/xfs-Os-g.ko.dis > > 649338e1b8eeed6a294504fc76a39cb0 native/xfs-O2-g.ko.dis > e52c2a48277326c313bba76aa0b33ab7 cross/xfs-O2-g.ko.dis > > The diff of the disassembly of the others is huge, hard to > know where to start just yet. Need an objdump mode that only > shows function-relative addresses or something to cut down > on the noise. Could you try the same, to isolate the differences: objdump -d all of the *.o files for, say, the -O2 build, md5sum & compare, and see which ones differ? -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs