From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF627FB3 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:56:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5536C8F8052 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id brBq3HIFXnKh1Xib for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:55:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5131400E.5060207@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:55:58 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_repair segfaults References: <5131283F.8030704@sandeen.net> <20130301223116.GE23616@dastard> <51312C73.5060203@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <51312C73.5060203@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Ole Tange , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 3/1/13 4:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Ole, you can xfs_mdrestore your metadump image and run test repairs on the result, If you like, test it after applying the patch I just sent. (or wait 'til it's reviewed) :) Anyway, running in non "-n" mode will avoid the segfault you reported. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs