From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05682806B for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:23:31 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <5136544B.2030004@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:23:39 -0600 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: handle new mkfs.btrfs -f option cleanly References: <512D1E3E.9050907@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <512D1E3E.9050907@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Stefan Behrens , linux-btrfs , xfs-oss Looks good. Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston This patch has been committed. Thanks --Rich commit 24fef70ef3fa0be047264b7a40b0bcf86533ec22 Author: Eric Sandeen Date: Tue Feb 26 20:42:38 2013 +0000 xfstests: handle new mkfs.btrfs -f option cleanly I added an "-f" option to mkfs.btrfs to force overwrite of an existing filesystem. Now on an xfstests run, new mkfs.btrfs requires it, and old mkfs.btrfs cannot accept it. So, add a helper which works out whether -f is needed, and add it to the MKFS_BTRFS_PROG env. var as necessary, so that it is an always-included option during the tests. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs