From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2900F7FC8 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:56:37 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <5138AAA2.70308@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:56:34 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typo from commit 0c5e67e4 "xfstests 273: fix a typo" References: <20130307124102.821208303@sgi.com> <20130307124125.435047948@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20130307124125.435047948@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: rjohnston@sgi.com Cc: shhuiw@gmail.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 03/07/13 06:41, rjohnston@sgi.com wrote: > When updating the patch, the redirect was incorrect. > > Reported-by: Wang Sheng-Hui > Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston > > --- > > 273 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: b/273 > =================================================================== > --- a/273 > +++ b/273 > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ _porter() > exit > fi > > - cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix>$seq.full 2>>&1 > + cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix>>$seq.full 2>&1 > if [ $? -ne 0 ] > then > echo "_porter $_suffix not complete" > The original patch looked okay: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-02/msg00518.html Should the bad patch be reverted and the original one put in? --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs