From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC9E801B for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:38:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <51432470.2000800@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:38:56 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfstests patches References: <1363186623-1378-1-git-send-email-sandeen@redhat.com> <514205DC.9040902@sgi.com> <20130315054350.GC2559@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130315054350.GC2559@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 03/15/2013 12:43 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:16:12PM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote: >> On 03/13/2013 09:57 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> 2 pretty simple ones, and a new btrfs test >>> >>> [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: add 274 to the prealloc group >>> [PATCH 2/3] xfstests: keep newlines out of SCRATCH_DEV_POOL >>> [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> xfs mailing list >>> xfs@oss.sgi.com >>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs >>> >> >> This series has been committed. > > Rich, can you please be careful to check the test numbers being used > in patches that are sent to the list before you commit them? > >>> [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands > > This test was numbered 313, and so now we have tests 001-306 and 313 > in the repository. I noticed that Another of Eric's recent patches > is numbered 315, so it will also need renumbering before commit. > > -Dave. > Yes I will, sorry it applied so cleanly and I was trying to get it committed before I left for the day I overlooked the numbering. I will revert and recommit it with the correct number 306. Thanks for pointing that out. Regards --Rich _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs