From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Count journal size in test 289
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:05:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51489ACE.1010205@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363710082-11371-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
On 3/19/13 11:21 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Test 289 ignored the fact that historically journal is not accounted as
> fs overhead. For larger filesystems it is hidden in 1% tolerance but for
> filesystems smaller than 12G the test fails. So make the counting
> precise to work everywhere.
Thanks.
0875a2b448fcaba67010850cf9649293a5ef653d ext4: include journal blocks in df overhead calcs
changed this again, right - so will this change work in both cases?
Also: is using "Journal length: " any simpler?
Although I do like the new filter ;)
-Eric
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
> 289 | 12 ++++++++----
> common.filter | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/289 b/289
> index b057c20..9bba144 100755
> --- a/289
> +++ b/289
> @@ -59,10 +59,14 @@ TOTAL_BLOCKS=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
> FREE_BLOCKS=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
> | awk '/Free blocks:/{print $3}'`
>
> -# nb: kernels today don't count journal blocks as overhead, but should.
> -# For most filesystems this will still be within tolerance.
> -# Overhead is all the blocks (already) used by the fs itself:
> -OVERHEAD=$(($TOTAL_BLOCKS-$FREE_BLOCKS))
> +JOURNAL_SIZE=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
> + | awk '/Journal size:/{print $3}' | _filter_size_to_bytes`
> +BLOCK_SIZE=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
> + | awk '/Block size:/{print $3}'`
> +JOURNAL_BLOCKS=$(($JOURNAL_SIZE/$BLOCK_SIZE))
> +
> +# kernels today don't count journal blocks as overhead, but should.
> +OVERHEAD=$(($TOTAL_BLOCKS-$FREE_BLOCKS-$JOURNAL_BLOCKS))
>
> # bsddf|minixdf
> # Set the behaviour for the statfs system call. The minixdf
> diff --git a/common.filter b/common.filter
> index f0f6076..fcd7589 100644
> --- a/common.filter
> +++ b/common.filter
> @@ -229,5 +229,20 @@ _filter_spaces()
> sed -e 's/ [ ]*/ /g'
> }
>
> +# Convert string read from stdin like 128K to bytes and print it to stdout
> +_filter_size_to_bytes()
> +{
> + read size
> + suffix=${size:${#size}-1}
> + mul=1
> + case $suffix in
> + K) mul=1024 ;;
> + M) mul=$((1024*1024)) ;;
> + G) mul=$((1024*1024*1024)) ;;
> + T) mul=$((1024*1024*1024*1024)) ;;
> + esac
> + echo $((${size:0:${#size}-1}*$mul))
> +}
> +
> # make sure this script returns success
> /bin/true
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 16:21 [PATCH] xfstests: Count journal size in test 289 Jan Kara
2013-03-19 17:05 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-20 10:47 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-20 14:24 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51489ACE.1010205@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox