From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B607F37 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:13:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5B58F804C for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MLW6BlYwmfAjoHJ7 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so3085275iea.38 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <514AA503.4060101@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:13:23 +0800 From: Wang Sheng-Hui MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner , xfstests , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org _require_nobigloopfs has been removed. We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script. Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui --- 276 | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/276 b/276 index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755 --- a/276 +++ b/276 @@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch - -_require_nobigloopfs +_require_no_large_scratch_dev _require_btrfs inspect-internal _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag" -- 1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs