public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:51:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B72B9.1010005@jan-o-sch.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321195054.GO17758@dastard>



On 21.03.2013 20:50, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:59:45AM +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
>>
>> This patch adds execution of a custom command in the middle of all fsstress
>> operations. Its intended use is the creation of snapshots in the middle of a
>> test run.
> 
> Why do you need fsstress to do this? Why can't you just run fsstress
> in the background and run a loop creating periodic snapshots in the
> control script?

Because I want reproducible results. Same random seed should result in
the very same snapshots being created.

> Also, did you intend that every process creates a snapshot? i.e. it
> looks lik eif you run a 1000 processes, they'll all run a snapshot
> operation at X operations? i.e. this will generate nproc * X
> snapshots in a single run. This doesn't seem very wise to me....

Agreed, I haven't thought of running more than one process. For the sake
of reproducibility, I wouldn't want multiple processes for my test case
either.

I'm not sure if there are other applications than snapshot creation for
such a feature, so I cannot argue whether to have each process execute
such a command or not.

Thanks,
-Jan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-21 10:59 [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options) Jan Schmidt
2013-03-21 19:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-21 20:51   ` Jan Schmidt [this message]
2013-03-21 21:12     ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-22  7:06       ` Jan Schmidt
2013-03-24 23:51         ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 12:07           ` Jan Schmidt
2013-05-03 14:43             ` Jan Schmidt
2013-05-09 19:47               ` Rich Johnston
2013-05-09 19:50 ` Rich Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514B72B9.1010005@jan-o-sch.net \
    --to=list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox