From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D34D7F8D for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:37:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27D7AC005 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <515B4188.90205@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:37:28 -0400 From: Ric Wheeler MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: General Question... I note many emails about BTRFS ... is it related to XFS? References: <515B3F45.8070504@tlinx.org> <20130402203458.GY22182@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20130402203458.GY22182@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: xfs-oss On 04/02/2013 04:34 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Linda, > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:27:49PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: >> I have no issues with the messages related to BTRFS on the list, but it >> did stimulate my curiosity -- what's the relationship betweeen BTRFS and XFS? >> >> * Just using a similar test suite? > We're all sharing the test suite. ;) > > Regards, > Ben > And some of the developers are lucky enough to be shared between the two projects as well ;) Ric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs