From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0BE7F69
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:06:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209BEAC001
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-f45.google.com (mail-yh0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.213.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8LYqvjqVIULrrTvR
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 26so49608yhr.32
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <516571CA.1020908@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:06:02 -0400
From: "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: New xfstests generic/308 causes XFS hang (high CPU use), at least
	on 32-bit
References: <51656D47.9010806@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51656D47.9010806@gmail.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com

On 04/10/2013 09:46 AM, Michael L. Semon wrote:

> The PC uses kernel 3.8-rc4 + Dave's CRC v4 patches + J. Liu's bitness
> patch.

Oops, that was supposed to be "kernel 3.9-rc4."  Sorry.

Michael

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs