From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reserve fields in inode for parent ptr and alloc policy
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:40:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5165CE3C.3020701@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5165CC39.2090108@sgi.com>
On 4/10/13 3:31 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 04/10/13 14:39, Rich Johnston wrote:
>> On 04/10/2013 01:56 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 4/10/13 1:24 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>>>> Reserve fields in new inode layout for parent pointer and
>>>> allocation policy.
>>>> ----
>>>> The inode will hold the parent information for the first
>>>> link to a file. Information for the other links will be
>>>> held in extended attribute entries.
>>>>
>>>> The "di_parino" is the inode of the parent directory. The
>>>> directory information for this entry is located the parent
>>>> directory with "di_paroff" offset.
>>>>
>>>> The di_parino/di_paroff concept code is running.
>>>> ----
>>>> The "di_allocpolicy" will be used to remember the allocation
>>>> policy associated with this inode.
>>>
>>> can you say more about this allocation policy?
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>
>> No its super secret information. ;)
>>
>> Its on my plate Eric, because Mark was making a change for parent ptrs,
>> I asked him to request space for allocation policies also.
>>
>> I don't have all the details yet but here is a very high level concept.
>>
>> Identify allocation groups by names (or numbers -- preferably using names
>> in user-visible areas), allowing many different areas. Placing the
>> allocation
>> policy outside of user programs is necessary for this to be successful.
>>
>> Current thoughts on proposed a layered allocation policies:
>>
>> Policy for the entire filesystem
>> Policy attached to a directory (whose policy would be inherited by
>> subdirectories when subdirectories are created)
>> Policy for a single file
>>
>> The policy would define:
>>
>> where to place file data
>> where to place metadata for the files.
>> a prefered allocation group for placing file data (for directories).
>>
>> --Rich
>>
>
> The allocation policies is based on work by Dave:
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00250.html
>
> --Mark.
>
Great, thanks guys. I had forgotten about that TBH. Just wondered
if you had it in the works, or reserving just in case, or . . .
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 18:24 [PATCH] xfs: reserve fields in inode for parent ptr and alloc policy Mark Tinguely
2013-04-10 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-04-10 19:39 ` Rich Johnston
2013-04-10 20:31 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-04-10 20:40 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-04-11 3:28 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11 3:00 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11 13:54 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-04-12 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5165CE3C.3020701@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=rjohnston@sgi.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox